![]() I bought the 5200 instead as I think in the end it just made more sense for me and have since made a few additional "improvements" (Chris King Headset, Ultegra Pedals) but think the 5000 is unmistakingly a lot of bike for the money. I do not know if the paper was ever made public as it was written as sales information for the trade, I happened to get it when I visited a dealer over the winter who printed up the only information he could find for me on that specific bike off of the dealer resource site. ![]() I have the paper around here somewhere and if I can dig it up will post a more exact account. The paper goes on specifically compare the 5000 to the Giant and speaks about the main advantage Trek has is in the quality and workmanship of the frame, fork, and wheels which come on the 5000. I think what you may have read and/or possibly misunderstood part of a white paper originally provided by Trek to their dealers via their dealer website that compared the 5000 to the 5200 and stated that the reason they were releasing the 5000 was to be competitive with some lower priced carbon framed bikes from Giant and a few other brands.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |